Many in the media in ordinary politicians, expressed the Azaazoam, anger disgust their tirade of Avigdor Lieberman, this week, the UN they say "heap too much."
But what lives of those people? Is it personal communications and politicians failed to think beyond the territories? It's only natural for such a government will rise to the prime minister right "rebels" and the rabbis of peace. " True, they say, those people, but why degrade the Prime Minister and the state attended the UN? The same speech - ask correctly - could make Lieberman in the Knesset.
Really could. But again this is not a deep thinking clearly.
Without regard to the content of his speech Foreign Minister (and the diamond-shaped scales that palms and although it was little and holds multiple), Avigdor Lieberman, for his part discourse by its end, the speech itself showed how the state of Israel that wants peace with the Palestinians, and I see , mainly, according to Israeli media's reactions, just "bump" the foreign meat in advanced media print media and by the comments of quite a few politicians Amakoalcia itself and the opposition. right Omashaml.
According Makatargym, the Foreign Minister's speech at the UN is not acceptable in terms of local content. That is to say - even sub Lieberman space to the world and time and place he used were not correct or even worse. They, them, believe in direct talks, direct talks the overall peace process.
This fact, sees the world the "deep shock" expresses the public, media and government Randall's lips one foreign minister and "brightly colored painting" Israel's commitment to peace for me a two-state solution. And that good - the state benefited!
In passing, so do the Arabs themselves.
Most Arab leaders, particularly those of Fatah and the PLO (the time) attack the Zionists, did not recognize the State of Israel to the Jewish people, Mshloevim the crowd against the Israelis and condemn acts of terrorism. Immediately after the event or the other, leaving one leader, uttered words of peace and forgiving the world's media the next day painting the colors of the Palestinian peace-seekers define their own citizens as a leader of peace and Ratner. "
So our foreign minister apparently did not invent the formula of "good cop bad cop." After all, the detainee exhausted beating and pouring of the bad cop, would be happy to tell all sins to the good cop on a cup of coffee and a cigarette. This name of the game.
And here's another one aspect, the Palestinian media have thought about us. Aspect of the conspiracy theories Lminhen enthusiasts.
According to this theory, Lieberman's speech was coordinated with Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. Lieberman, apparently, was aware of the media echoes, the expected consequences blast waves after his speech and "sacrificed" himself politically for the peace process.
So, is Lieberman's speech Abigadre was so dangerous for Israel? Was he so dangerous situations Achshmnathim echoes all the following media?
Among the visitors the foreign minister, can be found, of course, the Professor Avishai Braverman, the gate was interested minorities.
Braverman asked Netanyahu to fire immediately Lieberman Avigdor Lieberman Abthoae harmful to Israel unprecedented damage. Braverman, of course, not one among the congregation of fans of the Secretary of State Lieberman and frequently visit him and brand him as a bad foreign R "in all possible media.
But Braverman wrong and misleading. Avigdor Lieberman is a bad foreign minister, but the opposite. Israel's diplomatic Nemshber with some countries is nothing more than political spin and trying to paste the name of Lieberman.
Lieberman has been interviewed interested "crises."
"Just this week, one day, I met with Foreign Minister of Germany, Foreign Minister of England, the Netherlands, Finland, Lithuania and Malta of the European Parliament in Brussels. Sometimes difficult conversations we had and sometimes we went to all sorts of philosophical discussions, but they all appreciate me because They know I'm not selling mine.
When I look at the recent vote on a report that UN Goldstone I see we got a situation where for the first time 18 countries voted with us. Once we were accustomed to the UN, alongside Israel, there are only the United States and Micronesia. Today there are many European countries stabilized by us a close. "
Only during an Israeli foreign minister arrives for the first time to Africa. I was with President of Uganda. I apologized to him that we visited there 40 years. And he gives me with my hand like that, not right mister, you were not here 45 years. Golda Meir visited us in , '64- And you had another visit, but he does not count.
There are many people who do not like me, but everyone refers to me seriously. I think we moved to Norway and Belgium. I speak with their foreign ministers on the phone many times. Norwegians spent a week not to support a vote on the Goldstone report. They also rejected all attempts for an academic boycott on Israel a close. "
Avigdor Lieberman is an excellent foreign minister, yes, real honest. Foreign Minister did not grovel to the world, Foreign Minister transmitting power, self-confidence and brand the country a strong and alert - these things were so missing the State of Israel in the recent past.
But what lives of those people? Is it personal communications and politicians failed to think beyond the territories? It's only natural for such a government will rise to the prime minister right "rebels" and the rabbis of peace. " True, they say, those people, but why degrade the Prime Minister and the state attended the UN? The same speech - ask correctly - could make Lieberman in the Knesset.
Really could. But again this is not a deep thinking clearly.
Without regard to the content of his speech Foreign Minister (and the diamond-shaped scales that palms and although it was little and holds multiple), Avigdor Lieberman, for his part discourse by its end, the speech itself showed how the state of Israel that wants peace with the Palestinians, and I see , mainly, according to Israeli media's reactions, just "bump" the foreign meat in advanced media print media and by the comments of quite a few politicians Amakoalcia itself and the opposition. right Omashaml.
According Makatargym, the Foreign Minister's speech at the UN is not acceptable in terms of local content. That is to say - even sub Lieberman space to the world and time and place he used were not correct or even worse. They, them, believe in direct talks, direct talks the overall peace process.
This fact, sees the world the "deep shock" expresses the public, media and government Randall's lips one foreign minister and "brightly colored painting" Israel's commitment to peace for me a two-state solution. And that good - the state benefited!
In passing, so do the Arabs themselves.
Most Arab leaders, particularly those of Fatah and the PLO (the time) attack the Zionists, did not recognize the State of Israel to the Jewish people, Mshloevim the crowd against the Israelis and condemn acts of terrorism. Immediately after the event or the other, leaving one leader, uttered words of peace and forgiving the world's media the next day painting the colors of the Palestinian peace-seekers define their own citizens as a leader of peace and Ratner. "
So our foreign minister apparently did not invent the formula of "good cop bad cop." After all, the detainee exhausted beating and pouring of the bad cop, would be happy to tell all sins to the good cop on a cup of coffee and a cigarette. This name of the game.
And here's another one aspect, the Palestinian media have thought about us. Aspect of the conspiracy theories Lminhen enthusiasts.
According to this theory, Lieberman's speech was coordinated with Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. Lieberman, apparently, was aware of the media echoes, the expected consequences blast waves after his speech and "sacrificed" himself politically for the peace process.
So, is Lieberman's speech Abigadre was so dangerous for Israel? Was he so dangerous situations Achshmnathim echoes all the following media?
Among the visitors the foreign minister, can be found, of course, the Professor Avishai Braverman, the gate was interested minorities.
Braverman asked Netanyahu to fire immediately Lieberman Avigdor Lieberman Abthoae harmful to Israel unprecedented damage. Braverman, of course, not one among the congregation of fans of the Secretary of State Lieberman and frequently visit him and brand him as a bad foreign R "in all possible media.
But Braverman wrong and misleading. Avigdor Lieberman is a bad foreign minister, but the opposite. Israel's diplomatic Nemshber with some countries is nothing more than political spin and trying to paste the name of Lieberman.
Lieberman has been interviewed interested "crises."
"Just this week, one day, I met with Foreign Minister of Germany, Foreign Minister of England, the Netherlands, Finland, Lithuania and Malta of the European Parliament in Brussels. Sometimes difficult conversations we had and sometimes we went to all sorts of philosophical discussions, but they all appreciate me because They know I'm not selling mine.
When I look at the recent vote on a report that UN Goldstone I see we got a situation where for the first time 18 countries voted with us. Once we were accustomed to the UN, alongside Israel, there are only the United States and Micronesia. Today there are many European countries stabilized by us a close. "
Only during an Israeli foreign minister arrives for the first time to Africa. I was with President of Uganda. I apologized to him that we visited there 40 years. And he gives me with my hand like that, not right mister, you were not here 45 years. Golda Meir visited us in , '64- And you had another visit, but he does not count.
There are many people who do not like me, but everyone refers to me seriously. I think we moved to Norway and Belgium. I speak with their foreign ministers on the phone many times. Norwegians spent a week not to support a vote on the Goldstone report. They also rejected all attempts for an academic boycott on Israel a close. "
Avigdor Lieberman is an excellent foreign minister, yes, real honest. Foreign Minister did not grovel to the world, Foreign Minister transmitting power, self-confidence and brand the country a strong and alert - these things were so missing the State of Israel in the recent past.
אין תגובות:
הוסף רשומת תגובה