To the rising anti-Semitism rising wave of "enlightened intellectuals" in Israel (some call it "self-flagellation") recently joined the "Star dare" new. Natan Zach question, or his real name - Harry Zietlbeach.
Jewish anti-Semitism is nothing new in Israel, abroad really is not. U.S. For example, we used to see such phenomena, especially college, when Stondttim professors try to join with Jews "enlightened" and just did not stick image "occupation", so to speak. Not too long ago we called the DW's nasty false report jurist Richard Goldstone, about terrorism rally came to Israel from Turkey in which he accuses the State of Israel crossing the border war crime (and the dialog - duplicity and hypocrisy celebrating, how No. serving top-appeal judge South Africa's apartheid era, he confirmed the execution of 28 blacks on violent crimes and punishment beatings of four blacks. one of the judgments Goldstone wrote that "the gallows is the only punishment that might deter murderers." Also sent to prison 13 year old who demonstrated against apartheid) and Missing more examples Jewish anti-Semites in the world - it is usually in the feminine spirit "of course.
But still there is a difference between the other anti-Semites of the Jewish State of Israel itself (Amos Oz, David Grossman, A.. In Joshua, and the like "axis of evil") and it gave clear.
Who is not familiar with the history of Zach, the great poet of the past, Almadchma the latter, on the other part is not considered Jewish according to Judaism because his mother was Christian and his father was an Italian Jewish German. According to Judaism, of course, the mother's religion is the determining factor.
But does this justify anti-Semitism, an accusation that all the ills of the world stem from the State of Israel (accusations of poor, ignorant and lacking in foundation as soon Andeskas them) swing terrorists?
By the way, not only the state of Israel itself felt the "landed arm" of the poet's anti-Semitic and racist, but also in the eastern community. Just this year, in an interview on Channel 10, spoke out in racist Natan Zach and blunt, saying in part "niggers shooting niggers." He added: "It's for Negroes Oriental," and - "there are two peoples who are not anything in common, these are the highest culture change, Western culture - European, who come from the caves." Following criticism of these statements Zach published an article Comment (cannot of course, one of the elements Jewish anti-Semitic base average). I wonder what will be this time ..
Even the very problem (or illness, you decide you) the poet's elder should not be an excuse for serious anti-Semitic manifestations.
Alcohol problem of Natan Zach is not anything new. It also reflected an embarrassing incident marred the Labour Party conference, when the poet Natan Zach - support the party - began to speak to the public while waving his arms. Labor officials believed that the poet was in drunk and he turns a few minutes by securing the front of the stage. Zach tried to resist the guards but he was pushed to the back of the stage present in trying to calm him.
I wonder if in another country, she was not "an apartheid state," for example - one of the Arab states, would get the problem with understanding ..
My guess - no.
An interview with Zach to YNET, he claimed proudly: "I want to remind people that my views have not changed in 20 years. When I returned from England in 1978 I announced a program of sorts TV glory my legs would not cross the Green Line. I will not visit there, and I do not want to spray get there. not Adroach in occupied territory. " He welcomed the initiative for the boycott of the theater on the settlement and said that during a visit Abgernia"ar me a huge demonstration attended by not only Muslims and called his name Israel an apartheid state. This country, I do not want to live, "he asserted. In addition, Zach strongly criticized the government expressed its concern that Israel would lead to wars and bloodshed: "I'm ready to rally - if I were a better swimmer I was also swimming. We built the jihad with our refusal." The poet said that the occupation is the source of most ills of Israeli society: "cruel oppression in our room. Not a day that people here are killed. The violence on the roads and in - school horror occupation. I was the security officer of the division 8. I do not defaulted, I participated in three wars that were life and death. "
As for his own quarters in the country, Zach said that "If I had known that Israel will be what it is today, I would not return to Israel from England in 1978. Can be written in Hebrew without living here. Do not need to hear every day on torture or accidentally killing a Palestinian. I would not want to end my life an apartheid state. "
Finally Msharoar question: "How can you fight with the entire Arab world forever?".
Well, let's start.
"Those who do not live in the valley, live in".
Natan Zach himself is using this statement. On the other hand, he himself thinks so: When a person declares that "only some glial not cross the Green Line. I will not visit there, I do not want to get there and spray Adroach occupied territory" - he automatically assumes that whoever does not live in Tel Aviv, Israel is probably not enough, not Jew stops and nothing about Zionism, who lives in the State of Tel Aviv, then this is probably at Bir human rights, "person" enlightened, civilized, rational and clear head.
Zach apparently has not visited in the West Bank in his life. If so, was it because they know that only the settlers, the state of his TA is in range of rockets and various like the Kassams. To sit down, they constitute a clear barrier between terrorists Tel - Aviv. Instead of sitting quietly Absnekin drink coffee, he still dare to complain.
I wonder whether Israel is really an apartheid state? Immediately comes to me oxygen to the brain and settle my mind.
Regardless of the history of Greater Israel, the Bible and so on. Governor really did not have any property rights to the land. Say really conquered it. I can to cooperate, briefly, with those "thinkers" Parents who do not understand a thing Israel's history.
Today, Gaza is not occupied at all.
Natan Zach quantity forgotten that Israel withdrew all settlements from the Gaza Strip. Gaza has a gate "to the world" through the Rafah crossing, which is controlled by Egypt - an Arab country in every respect.
We do not control them and we must provide them with nothing. Particularly when Hamas - who wants to destroy us, (yes, my dear Nathan. Morning) took over the Gaza Strip by force.
Why Mr. Zach entitled to roam the occupied Jaffa, the Executive Committee of the World (Summayl), Tel Aviv University (Sheikh - Munis), Acre, Hey path (a - stalactite), Ein - Hod (eye - Guus) and other places occupied by "J. of steps - the generation of Independence - that" killed, expelled and destroyed "the communities of the Palestinians" poor "because of you are sitting still in refugee camps? Is this not hypocrisy?
Ariel Jaffa Why not forbidden? Why we do not get the desired response so small from generations?
Whether people can be naive and innocent enough to close my eyes as Three monkeys Ahhmchim?
Furthermore. Events Atartz"v Atartz"te broke for lines 67, the events of riots also were a response to Israeli hostility.
How is such an Arab terrorist - Jihad to be exact - was because of Israel? After all these events occurred before the State!
Moreover, the Jihad is holy war, religious war and not "political war." That is to say - if and when the Arabs conquered the State of Israel, Natan Zach, knowingly could not sit Absnekin Ulatsut tea. Jihad orders to kill all infidels Hopper is non-Muslim.
Also, "Jihad", which speaks pure defense, is a sister movement the Muslim Brotherhood founded in Egypt in the thirties of last century.
Global jihad against Western civilization is. This is in the darkness to the light.
It has nothing to do with the State of Israel and the Palestinian problem (if the Arab nations was so mind their Palestinian brothers, they would give them a place in their country and they are looking for solutions only in the most advanced democracy in the Middle East, which happens to belong to the Jews).
The problem is not that the Palestinians do not state, but Jews have!
And that, given the likes smug Msonvarut not see their eyes.
Is Jihad really "born" as a result of "occupation"?
In light of solid facts - probably not.
Mgalvmanioat of them anti-Semitic Jews and hypocrites are convinced that what is happening in the Middle East is the creation of Israel, pitiful and incomprehensible stupidity.
These are people ignorant, uninformed and historical background that "ministers without aim."
Has a "kill" the same people liars, spreading fictions engage Beda - legitimacy to Israel Israel, root for good.
Yes, there is room for democratic political discourse between left and right, although even though there are hard facts the real truth in history and in the field, but in any of the painted anti-Semitic Jews in Muallem - have a world of difference and it's dangerous. Dangerous to us citizens, it is dangerous to Israel and dangerous world.
Jewish anti-Semitism is nothing new in Israel, abroad really is not. U.S. For example, we used to see such phenomena, especially college, when Stondttim professors try to join with Jews "enlightened" and just did not stick image "occupation", so to speak. Not too long ago we called the DW's nasty false report jurist Richard Goldstone, about terrorism rally came to Israel from Turkey in which he accuses the State of Israel crossing the border war crime (and the dialog - duplicity and hypocrisy celebrating, how No. serving top-appeal judge South Africa's apartheid era, he confirmed the execution of 28 blacks on violent crimes and punishment beatings of four blacks. one of the judgments Goldstone wrote that "the gallows is the only punishment that might deter murderers." Also sent to prison 13 year old who demonstrated against apartheid) and Missing more examples Jewish anti-Semites in the world - it is usually in the feminine spirit "of course.
But still there is a difference between the other anti-Semites of the Jewish State of Israel itself (Amos Oz, David Grossman, A.. In Joshua, and the like "axis of evil") and it gave clear.
Who is not familiar with the history of Zach, the great poet of the past, Almadchma the latter, on the other part is not considered Jewish according to Judaism because his mother was Christian and his father was an Italian Jewish German. According to Judaism, of course, the mother's religion is the determining factor.
But does this justify anti-Semitism, an accusation that all the ills of the world stem from the State of Israel (accusations of poor, ignorant and lacking in foundation as soon Andeskas them) swing terrorists?
By the way, not only the state of Israel itself felt the "landed arm" of the poet's anti-Semitic and racist, but also in the eastern community. Just this year, in an interview on Channel 10, spoke out in racist Natan Zach and blunt, saying in part "niggers shooting niggers." He added: "It's for Negroes Oriental," and - "there are two peoples who are not anything in common, these are the highest culture change, Western culture - European, who come from the caves." Following criticism of these statements Zach published an article Comment (cannot of course, one of the elements Jewish anti-Semitic base average). I wonder what will be this time ..
Even the very problem (or illness, you decide you) the poet's elder should not be an excuse for serious anti-Semitic manifestations.
Alcohol problem of Natan Zach is not anything new. It also reflected an embarrassing incident marred the Labour Party conference, when the poet Natan Zach - support the party - began to speak to the public while waving his arms. Labor officials believed that the poet was in drunk and he turns a few minutes by securing the front of the stage. Zach tried to resist the guards but he was pushed to the back of the stage present in trying to calm him.
I wonder if in another country, she was not "an apartheid state," for example - one of the Arab states, would get the problem with understanding ..
My guess - no.
An interview with Zach to YNET, he claimed proudly: "I want to remind people that my views have not changed in 20 years. When I returned from England in 1978 I announced a program of sorts TV glory my legs would not cross the Green Line. I will not visit there, and I do not want to spray get there. not Adroach in occupied territory. " He welcomed the initiative for the boycott of the theater on the settlement and said that during a visit Abgernia"ar me a huge demonstration attended by not only Muslims and called his name Israel an apartheid state. This country, I do not want to live, "he asserted. In addition, Zach strongly criticized the government expressed its concern that Israel would lead to wars and bloodshed: "I'm ready to rally - if I were a better swimmer I was also swimming. We built the jihad with our refusal." The poet said that the occupation is the source of most ills of Israeli society: "cruel oppression in our room. Not a day that people here are killed. The violence on the roads and in - school horror occupation. I was the security officer of the division 8. I do not defaulted, I participated in three wars that were life and death. "
As for his own quarters in the country, Zach said that "If I had known that Israel will be what it is today, I would not return to Israel from England in 1978. Can be written in Hebrew without living here. Do not need to hear every day on torture or accidentally killing a Palestinian. I would not want to end my life an apartheid state. "
Finally Msharoar question: "How can you fight with the entire Arab world forever?".
Well, let's start.
"Those who do not live in the valley, live in".
Natan Zach himself is using this statement. On the other hand, he himself thinks so: When a person declares that "only some glial not cross the Green Line. I will not visit there, I do not want to get there and spray Adroach occupied territory" - he automatically assumes that whoever does not live in Tel Aviv, Israel is probably not enough, not Jew stops and nothing about Zionism, who lives in the State of Tel Aviv, then this is probably at Bir human rights, "person" enlightened, civilized, rational and clear head.
Zach apparently has not visited in the West Bank in his life. If so, was it because they know that only the settlers, the state of his TA is in range of rockets and various like the Kassams. To sit down, they constitute a clear barrier between terrorists Tel - Aviv. Instead of sitting quietly Absnekin drink coffee, he still dare to complain.
I wonder whether Israel is really an apartheid state? Immediately comes to me oxygen to the brain and settle my mind.
Regardless of the history of Greater Israel, the Bible and so on. Governor really did not have any property rights to the land. Say really conquered it. I can to cooperate, briefly, with those "thinkers" Parents who do not understand a thing Israel's history.
Today, Gaza is not occupied at all.
Natan Zach quantity forgotten that Israel withdrew all settlements from the Gaza Strip. Gaza has a gate "to the world" through the Rafah crossing, which is controlled by Egypt - an Arab country in every respect.
We do not control them and we must provide them with nothing. Particularly when Hamas - who wants to destroy us, (yes, my dear Nathan. Morning) took over the Gaza Strip by force.
Why Mr. Zach entitled to roam the occupied Jaffa, the Executive Committee of the World (Summayl), Tel Aviv University (Sheikh - Munis), Acre, Hey path (a - stalactite), Ein - Hod (eye - Guus) and other places occupied by "J. of steps - the generation of Independence - that" killed, expelled and destroyed "the communities of the Palestinians" poor "because of you are sitting still in refugee camps? Is this not hypocrisy?
Ariel Jaffa Why not forbidden? Why we do not get the desired response so small from generations?
Whether people can be naive and innocent enough to close my eyes as Three monkeys Ahhmchim?
Furthermore. Events Atartz"v Atartz"te broke for lines 67, the events of riots also were a response to Israeli hostility.
How is such an Arab terrorist - Jihad to be exact - was because of Israel? After all these events occurred before the State!
Moreover, the Jihad is holy war, religious war and not "political war." That is to say - if and when the Arabs conquered the State of Israel, Natan Zach, knowingly could not sit Absnekin Ulatsut tea. Jihad orders to kill all infidels Hopper is non-Muslim.
Also, "Jihad", which speaks pure defense, is a sister movement the Muslim Brotherhood founded in Egypt in the thirties of last century.
Global jihad against Western civilization is. This is in the darkness to the light.
It has nothing to do with the State of Israel and the Palestinian problem (if the Arab nations was so mind their Palestinian brothers, they would give them a place in their country and they are looking for solutions only in the most advanced democracy in the Middle East, which happens to belong to the Jews).
The problem is not that the Palestinians do not state, but Jews have!
And that, given the likes smug Msonvarut not see their eyes.
Is Jihad really "born" as a result of "occupation"?
In light of solid facts - probably not.
Mgalvmanioat of them anti-Semitic Jews and hypocrites are convinced that what is happening in the Middle East is the creation of Israel, pitiful and incomprehensible stupidity.
These are people ignorant, uninformed and historical background that "ministers without aim."
Has a "kill" the same people liars, spreading fictions engage Beda - legitimacy to Israel Israel, root for good.
Yes, there is room for democratic political discourse between left and right, although even though there are hard facts the real truth in history and in the field, but in any of the painted anti-Semitic Jews in Muallem - have a world of difference and it's dangerous. Dangerous to us citizens, it is dangerous to Israel and dangerous world.
אין תגובות:
הוסף רשומת תגובה