יום שישי, 19 בנובמבר 2010

"truth or dare"


Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, is currently between a rock and a hard place. On the one hand there is pressure freezing outside, especially from the U.S. to receive a handsome and attractive benefits package. On the other hand - pressure from government ministers and commitments to government and to citizens.
Can be said that Benjamin Netanyahu, in spite of himself, playing "truth or dare" - the famous childhood game where have to choose between a genuine answer to the question of piercing and making the challenging duty. Some even say that the Prime Minister hoists the recent double-edged sword and that next month, Netanyahu will have to pass with minimal injuries - and will, no doubt. The question is how they affect the political status - the prime minister's public? That we will know very soon.

Thus, Netanyahu must participate in the game and choose between the truth - the nation of its obligations towards me, and the duty - Requirements pressure from the Americans, especially.
However, Prime Minister Netanyahu, is well-known quality and increases in sophistication of "his" ability to reject the agenda of things elegance - qualities not disabled for any politician - and certainly was on track last two days. Very can be that the prime minister had achieved a significant political effect that probably will help him through this period with minimal injuries.
Netanyahu seems to have guarantees from the White House requires a written obligation, package the state offered terms that Americans generously.
This requirement of Benjamin Netanyahu expressed total disbelief in American policy commitments, fasten Obama and put him in embarrassing situation - especially toward the Palestinians entered by rumors of the deal and nothing more - and giving the Israeli prime minister against the reaction time pressures at home.

One can understand this requirement of Benjamin Netanyahu. It was the same Obama who, together with other White House staff, fell silent at Netanyahu and the Israeli government demands that the United States will act according to the same policies that Bush promised Sharon - the de facto recognition of the largest settlements in blocs. Bush, as noted, expressly agreed not to continue construction in the settlement blocs, but revealed an understanding that Israel will continue in the future, even after the order, keep in major Israeli population centers, and otherwise - is recognized Israel's right to continue construction in these places.
Nevertheless, Obama completely ignored Bush's commitments and demanded a freeze in all Judea and Samaria - leading Netanyahu to freeze construction in settlements in for ten months - an act that is unmatched in the world.

Benefits package for the U.S. government's tempting. Could and should understand the Benjamin Netanyahu and his thinking - especially in terms of strategy - security.
Hard to say no to Obama's move. In addition to the extraordinary pressure of the Americans on the prime minister, there are unprecedented promises that include "package" a fine of 20 aircraft worth $ 3 billion in addition to imposing a veto in any discussion that Israel will be in a negative light or exceed the UN subjective discussion.
Also, we must not forget that in recent months formed a dangerous move by Erekat, Abu Mazen and Abu Ala concerning the submission of the UN Council resolution which includes a requirement for the establishment of a Palestinian state unilaterally under UN auspices. This process has been a lot of supporters in Europe. And it would be a disaster for Israel.
In connection with this subject, you can understand why Americans interested veto is undoubtedly offer significant benefits of the package. If Obama does not look "right" from Netanyahu, he may eventually own support during the Abu - Ala important veto and Israel at present.
Without this offer, no one promises to Israel that the Americans did not impose that the veto. In fact, chances are that Obama will promote the interested himself if he saw that Netanyahu did not "progressive", so to speak. Americans veto promise, is mainly about this offer, in addition to Goldstonim committees and other committees and anti-Zionist UN.

This long-term vision and a good deal. What else? This deal had to actually happen these days, if Netanyahu did not agree to freeze a year earlier.
State of Israel should not signal to the world she was ready to return territories without having to haggle over security arrangements and recognition of Israel as a Jewish state with a Jewish majority.
Cape added to the prime minister promised that the cabinet meeting that there would be freezing again. Which indeed will be a strategic mistake to freeze settlements and check again that there is something to talk Achsabpoal no recognition of the Palestinians in a Jewish state and no agreements or understandings on security arrangements.
Another important interested mention that he end of the day, the election decided that most of the public chose Likud, settlements in, Zionism and love of Eretz Israel and in fact tired of the left feebly affordable.

Yet no matter whether Netanyahu would choose at the truth "or" containing "the game is so hard and everything is so critical that, once again shows that any assault of the Israeli media's cries of stolen personal Cossack left that" fabric are no longer relevant "time, they are nothing Besides nonsense.
Netanyahu goes state manages the affairs of state and the wisdom and restraint in crises with our friends most wisdom, patience and persistence - which is security of the State of Israel.

אין תגובות:

הוסף רשומת תגובה